Sunday, May 12, 2013

Shavuot: The Jewish Experience

I recently listened to a lecture by Rabbi Akiva Tatz on the importance of finding your roll in life. During the lecture, Rabbi Tatz explained that there is a basis of humanity that we must all learn in order to be decent people: respect for others, the right to certain freedoms, etc.  Upon that broad base, one “step up” is the unique foundation of Judaism, the ideas and ideals that the Jewish people must live up to.  And after becoming a part of humanity and becoming a part of our unique Jewishness, we must express our unique individuality given the tools life has given us.  As I listened to Rabbi Tatz set up this platform, I began to wonder: Why is it that, in my Jewish learning, there has been a big focus on ‘Jewish uniqueness’ and ‘the important of being an individual’ but the foundation upon which these things rest, humanity, is not as oft discussed?

I think one answer may be that we as Jews do not carry the torch of humanity alone.  We are one small nation among many other, more populous nations.  Yet despite this insignificance in size, the Jewish race has played a much larger role in the development of humanity both in the present and the past than perhaps any other nation.  Monotheism, treating others with respect and as equals, caring for the needy, technological and medicinal developments are just a few areas that our impact as Jews on the world has exceeded our size.  Another reason may be that societal norms are often at odds with Jewish values.  The more pronounced these differences, the more natural is the reaction to withdraw from participating in society, and to instead place greater focus on one’s smaller circle of like-minded individuals and one’s individual purpose. 

I don’t necessarily have a “problem” with the focus on Jewish uniqueness and one’s individuality, per se.  Both are things to be proud of!  Rather, I sometimes find that the lack of focus on humanity can indirectly lead to unintended consequences, such as lack of respect for others (non-Jews) and lack of ability – or desire – to relate to others human-to-human.  This is certainly not a prevalent problem, and Judaism certainly does not preach this practice, but it does seem to take hold among some. 

However, I do not intend (at this time) to write a dissertation on Judaism’s teaching methods and unintended consequences.  So….

If there is one holiday where Jewish uniqueness and individuality are especially prominent (although they are certainly prevalent in almost every aspect of life) that is the holiday of Shavuot, otherwise called Matan Torah, the holiday on which God spoke to the Jewish people and gave us with the gift of the Torah.  “Indeed, all the earth is Mine, but you shall be to Me a kingdom of priests and a holy nation,” God tells us (Exodus 19:6) on this day. 

Yet despite the significance of Shavuot in establishing the Jewish people’s progression throughout history as “the People of the Book,” it is the least well-known holiday among the majority of Jews (namely, non-Orthodox Jews).  The other four major holidays – Rosh Hashanah, Yom Kippur, Sukkot, and Passover – are more often celebrated by the vast majority of Jews than Shavuot.  And, interestingly, these holidays all seem to have a greater effect on the gentiles than Shavuot.  Maimonides states in the Mishnah Torah (Teshuva 3:3) that all people, not just Jews, are judged on Rosh Hashanah and their judgment is sealed on Yom Kippur.  On Sukkot, seventy sacrifices are brought on behalf of the seventy nations of the world (Rashi, and Zechariah 14:16).  And on Passover, while the focus is certainly on the Jewish people’s freedom from slavery, the involvement of other nations (namely, Egypt) is essential to the Passover story, and the Haggadah uses our experience as slaves to teach us: “You shall not oppress a stranger (i.e. non-Jew), for you know the feelings of the stranger (outsider), having yourself been strangers in Egypt.  When strangers (non-Jews) reside with you in your land you shall not wrong them….” 

Shavuot is uniquely focused on the Jewish people.  Sadly, perhaps this is partially why it is the least celebrated Jewish holiday.  There is an emphasis in many non-Orthodox denominations and congregations to push towards universalism: the global need for Tikkun Olam (repairing the world, most often used in the environmental sense by liberal Jews), the integration of Jewish values with societal values, the acceptance of interfaith marriages and families, the abolishment (rationalized or outright) of halachot (Jewish laws) that may keep us distinct from non-Jews such as kashrut and fully observing Shabbat, to name just a few.  Rabbi Tatz believes that Shavuot was lost to many Jews because of its central theme: From Pesach, the story of our freedom, we count fifty days (sefirat ha’omer) to Shavuot, the celebration of the Torah, the book of Mitzvoth, our obligations.  The modern Jew would rather forget the responsibility that being a Jew entails.

And while I agree that the responsibility of being Jewish is a great burden, I find no doubt that the blessing to be a Jew is much greater.

On Shavuot, the Jewish people stood at Mt. Sinai and accepted the Torah in a miraculous event, hearing the Ten Commandments directly from God: “And all the people saw the thunder and lightning, the voice of the shofar, and the mountain smoking; and when the people saw it, they trembled and stood at a distance” (Exodus 20:15).  After hearing the 10 Commandments, they were awe-struck and fearful of hearing God’s voice.  They called upon Moses: “Speak to us; and we will obey, but let not God speak to us [any more] lest we die! (20:16).”  The Sinai experience was one the Jewish people, despite their preparations, were unprepared for – a synthesis of the senses, an overtaking of the body by the soul, a transcendence of the barrier between the earth and the heavens.  The Jewish people did not hear, but saw thunder.  They drew close to God, but remained far from the Mount on which His voice emanated. 

In the haftarah, Ezekiel encountered a similar experience of divine revelation: “I looked, and behold, a stormy wind came out of the north – a huge cloud and flashing fire, surrounded by radiance; and in the center of it, in the center of the fire, a gleam as of amber” (Ezekiel 1:4).  Ezekiel, like the Jews at Sinai, is reluctant to receive his prophetic vision and become God’s prophet, as it says: “He [God] said to me [Ezekiel], Mortal, eat what is offered you; eat this scroll [God’s words], and go speak to the House of Israel.  So I opened my mouth, and He gave me this scroll to eat, as He said to me, “Mortal, feed your stomach and fill your belly with this scroll that I give you” (3:1-2). 

In discussing the Jews receiving the Torah at Sinai, the Gemara seems to state that the Jewish people, like Ezekiel, were “force-fed” the Torah:

“God suspended the mountain over [the Jewish people] like a barrel and said, “if you will accept the Torah, it will be good, and if not, here will be your burial place” (Shabbos 88a). 

Rabbi Yitzchak Cohen points out the seeming contradiction between this statement and the Torah verse where the Jewish people wholeheartedly accept the Torah willingly, saying “Na’aseh v’nishma – we will do and we will hear,” upon which the same Gemara comments:

“Rabbi Elazar said: when the Jewish people said “we will do” before “we will hear,” a voice from heaven came forth and said “who revealed to my children this secret that the administering angels use, as it says (in Tehilim 103:20)  bless God, his angels, mighty in strength, that do His will to hear the voice of His word.” 

To resolve the apparent contradiction between the verse claiming the Jews willingly accepted the Torah and the verse implying quite the opposite, many commentaries (Midrashim, Rashi, and the Maharal among them) state that the Jewish people did accept the Written Torah and certain mitzvoth, but not the complete Oral Torah.  In Rabbi Yehuda Amital's words, according to the Maharal, “the people’s observance of the Torah cannot be based simply on voluntarism and good will.  It needs to be based on coercion, on commitment, on worship of God; one must keep mitzvoth because one is obligated to do so, and not simply because one desires it.”  Therefore the Jews needed pressure to accept the whole Torah, in addition to their initial loving acceptance of the Written Torah. 

Interestingly, Rabbi Amital also touches on a factor causing Shavuot’s minimal status among today’s Jews: “Many people, especially in recent years, approach the Torah based solely on a spirit of voluntarism.  They want to fulfill those parts of the Torah that ‘speak to them,’ and operate without this feeling of commitment.  This is what the Gemara’s statement that God suspended the mountain over them comes to teach us: Torah can only be fulfilled properly through a sense of absolute commitment to the word of God, and not by doing just what one wants to do.” 

The coerced, and committed, Ezekiel concludes his consumption of the scroll by remarking: I ate it, and it tasted as sweet as honey to me.  So too, the Rabbis reference the Torah as sweet like milk and honey.  The willing acceptance of the Torah – na’aseh v’nishma – is a beautiful idea.  But it is fleeting – it allows for one to change their mind; it doesn’t demand full commitment.  The full obligation may be forced, such as it was to Ezekiel and the Jewish people at Sinai, but once we have swallowed it (“feed your stomach and fill your belly”), the fulfillment of our obligation tastes sweeter than the voluntary acceptance of only parts of the Torah. 

The Talmud teaches that the soul of every Jew, those born and those yet to be born, was present at Mt. Sinai to receive the Torah.  I think that one meaning of this Talmudic statement may be to impress upon us that we, not just our ancestors, accepted the Torah.  We, not just our ancestors, have obligated ourselves to follow the Torah.   And we, not just our ancestors, can taste its sweetness in our lives. 

Yes, as Rabbi Salomon Gruenwald puts it, “I don’t know exactly what the Talmud means by telling us that we were all at Sinai.  My mind cannot grasp that literally.  Nonetheless, I sincerely believe it to be true.”  I believe the spiritual experience of Sinai has produced a lasting Torah that has been carried on from generation to generation.  Pirkei Avot 6:2 says that “each and every day a divine voice calls out from Mount Horeb (i.e. Sinai).”  Our response to this voice is manifest through the halachot within the Torah, the performance of which “bridge the Torah from the written word to the living deed.”  This is the core of our Jewish uniqueness. 

At z’man matan Torateinu, the time of the giving of our Torah, the Jewish people accepted upon themselves and we accepted upon ourselves these halachot.  Our neshama, soul, experienced an incredible closeness to God, while our bodies fearfully crept further from Mount Sinai.  We lovingly accepted the Written Torah, but with a sense of fear and awe we were also coerced into accepting the entire Oral Torah.  The merging of all these aspects in our current lives – love, awe, and fear of Torah; a spiritual closeness to but understandable distance from God – is the core of our Jewish uniqueness.  And the way we unite them all into our own lives, is each of our individual struggle.

Chag Sameach!

Friday, May 3, 2013

Parshat Behar-Bechukosai: The Blessings and Curses

After a multitude of commandments are given in the previous few parshiyot and Behar, which is the first of two portions read this week, we come to parshat Bechukosai.  Bechukosai seemingly caps off the commandments by God telling the Jewish people of the concept of reward and punishment associated with the mitzvoth He has just given, specifically related to the privilege to reside in the land of Israel.  He begins with reward, stating: “If you follow My laws and faithfully observe My commandments…I will grant peace in the land…and I will be your God, and you shall by My people” (Vayikra 29:1-13).  And then He continues with the tocheicha (admonishments): “If you do not obey Me and do not observe all these commandments; if you reject My laws and spurn My rules, so that you do not observe all My commandments and you break My covenant, I in turn will do this to you: I will wreak misery upon you – consumption and fever…I will break your pride…I will go on smiting you sevenfold…I will spurn you…And you I will scatter among the nations” (Vayikra 26:14-42). 

The admonishments far outweigh the curses, encompassing twice as many verses.  God tells us (between each admonishment above) that he will give us chances; he will not instantly spurn us, but will first bring misery upon us as a warning.  If we do not repent, he will further oppress us; and the more obstinate we become the more he will punish us until our land is desolate.  As we read of this foreboding warning, it is eerily reminiscent of Pharaoh who was given ten chances (arguably only five) to release the Jews from captivity and each time he refused, he was smitten with a harsher plague until finally, reluctantly, he let us go (only to change his mind again).  So too, only after “I [God] have been hostile to them [the Jewish people] and have removed them into the land of their enemies, then at last shall their obdurate heart humble itself, and they shall atone for their iniquity” (Vayikra 26:41).  I am not sure the reason for this connection, but I do find it interesting….  Now, moving on to a commentary on the same verses:

The Ibn Ezra comments that these blesses and curses are placed at this point in the Torah to enforce the fact that when we inhabit the land in the Book of Numbers (Bamidbar), which we begin to read next week, we must still remember the Covenant we entered into with God.  That Covenant is the reason why we are able to inhabit the land flowing with milk and honey; when we forsake the Covenant “the land shall become desolate and your cities a ruin” (26:33).  The Covenant is the basis of our lives as Jews, and our lives are only as strong as our commitment to it.  And this Covenant is both strengthened and displayed through the performance of the mitzvoth.  Rabbi Samson Raphael Hirsch states that “none, not even the smallest of your activities – your deed, your word, even your thought – is without effect; they bring blessing or curse immediately, for every duty fulfilled gives you a greater capacity to fulfill new duties, each sin committed makes you more familiar with sin, less capable of doing good and more capable of committing further sin” (Horeb, Chapter 22).  Judaism believes (as do many modern psychologists) that our actions can shape our beliefs; repetitive performance of mitzvoth can strengthen our connection to and belief in them, just as a continuously forced smile or a mumbled compliment can transform us into a kinder person.  And these same actions are the ones that display our commitment to Judaism. 

Rabbi Heschel (who I find agrees with Rabbi Hirsch) believes: “Man is not for the sake of good deeds (mitzvoth); the good deeds are for the sake of man.  The goal (of deeds) is not that a ceremony be performed; the goal is that man be transformed; to worship the Holy in order to be holy” (God in Search of Man: A Philosophy of Judaism).  Yet despite Heschel’s assertion, Maimonides (who also seems to agree with Heschel) remarks: “You should believe that just as God wishes man to be erect in stature, broad chested, and to have fingers, so too He wishes him to move or be at rest of his own accord and to perform actions voluntarily.  He does not force him to perform them nor prevent him from performing them” (Commentary on the Mishna, Eight Chapters, pg. 1168).  And this is the reason for God’s warning against straying from the commandments.  We are given the choice to perform them, and they have indeed been given to us for our sake…but we must nonetheless struggle to realize this and struggle even further to live up to their lofty standards.  It is not always easy or apparent to us how they are a benefit to us but, as Hirsch alludes to, performance of the mitzvot are instructive in helping us understand them. 

Rabbi Berkovits says in the introduction to his philosophical/halachic work, Not in Heaven, that “Halacha is the bridge over which the Torah moves from the written word into the living deed.”  The mitzvoth bridge the gap between heaven and earth, trying to connect our physical reality to its higher purpose.  This is one thing God teaches by placing the tocheicha at the point in the Torah: our forefathers Avraham, Yitzchak, and Ya’akov were promised their ancestors would inherit the land of Israel and flourish; despite how often or long the Jewish people may forsake God, He reminds us that He will remember his promise.  He tells us: “I will remember My covenant with Ya’akov; I will remember also My covenant with Yitchak; and also My covenant with Avraham; and I will remember the land” (v. 26:42) and “I will not reject them [the future generations] or spurn them so as to destroy them, annulling my covenant with them: for I the Lord am their God. I will remember in their favor the covenant with the ancients, whom I freed from the land of Egypt in the sight of the nations to be their God; I, the Lord” (v. 26:44-45).   God will remember our covenant when we too remember the covenant to follow in His paths, to tranform our thoughts to deeds, and  to form the halachic bridge that increases our capacity for good.